In this way, “Global Mimesis: The Ethics of World Literature after Auerbach” addresses contemporary world literature’s ability to figure “a common life” not as a process of cultural and political standardization-as Erich Auerbach influentially argued in Mimesis (1946)-but rather as its ethical potential. Attending to how these works refigure the horizon and nature of the common at specific historical junctures, this study proposes a conception of the global as emergent within mimesis and reorients ethics away from the encounter with radical alterity toward the performative ways in which texts and objects contour publicity, give exemplary shape to actions and events, and relate audiences to seemingly distant worlds. Sebald, Orhan Pamuk, Teju Cole, and Naomi Wallace have used literary means to imagine collective life beyond the nation, in the process reconceiving literature’s ethical forms (Bildung, allegory, the sentimental). Reading across genres and continents, it shows how writers such as Samuel Beckett, Nuruddin Farah, J. Like The Scripture stories do not, like Homer’s, court our favor, they do not flatter us that they may please us and enchant usthey seek to subject us, and if we refuse to be subjected we are rebels. This project argues that the global in the literary is best approached not as a stable content, imposed ideology, or economic byproduct, but rather as an ethos, which has been at stake and emerging over the past half century in literature from around the world. Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |